Comprehensive, PRISMA-compliant literature reviews for theses, publications, and policy evidence.

I conduct rigorous systematic literature reviews across health sciences, epidemiology, public health, clinical research, and allied health fields. I handle the entire review process from protocol development to synthesis. Whether you need a review chapter for your thesis, evidence synthesis for a grant application, or a standalone review ready for publication, I deliver a thorough, methodologically sound output.

I develop your research question using PICO or PEO frameworks, design comprehensive search strategies for PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, screen titles and abstracts against eligibility criteria, extract data using customized forms, assess study quality using validated tools (ROBINS-I, Cochrane Risk of Bias, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, GRADE), and synthesize findings narratively. I also produce PRISMA flow diagrams, evidence tables, quality assessment summaries, and a complete review report ready for thesis inclusion or manuscript preparation.

If you need quantitative synthesis, I can also perform meta-analysis including pooled effect sizes, forest plots, heterogeneity assessment (I²), subgroup analysis, and publication bias assessment (funnel plot, Egger's test).

What's included:

• Protocol development with clear research question

• Comprehensive search strategy for multiple databases

• Title, abstract, and full-text screening

• Data extraction using customized forms

• Quality assessment using validated tools

• PRISMA flow diagram and checklist

• Narrative synthesis of findings

• Evidence tables and quality summaries

• Meta-analysis (if requested): forest plots, heterogeneity, publication bias

• Complete review report

• EndNote/Zotero librar